ONAP Container/Container Orchestration Engine(COE) support

Code Name: COE


This page tracks the related materials/discussions/etc related to Container based network service/function deployment(ONAP container/Container Orchestration Engine(COE)) effort.

As starting point, this effort has started as small subgroup of multicloud as task force.As the efforts evolve, logistics would be revised. Maybe this task force would be promoted to a independent group or an independent project.


Meetings


Items

  • determine timeslot for weekly zoom meeting: doodle poll
    • new time slot is China CST(Wed)2:00am/UTC(Wed) 18:00PM/ET(Tue) 13:00pm/PT(Tue) 10:00am
    • start from Jan 16/17
  • materials for Usecase subcommittee
  • update matrials for architecture subcommittee
  • settle down legistics
    • subproject under the umbrella of multicloud project
    • sub PTL for
    • setup repo
      • committers
    • JIRA items
  • Beijing planning
    • use case
  • archtecture/API design: WIP
  • use case proposal
    • impacted projects
  • architecture proposal
    • discussion points
    • how to register k8s cluster
    • how to deploy vnf
    • life cycle management and others(e.g. auto scaling): generic VNF controllers
  • Create repository: now asking Gildas infra manager for it.
  • start implementation


timeline

  • Feb 5, 2018: discussion at multicloud meeting
  • Feb 6, 2018: weekly meeting
  • Feb 18, 2018: M2 deadline



Design Documents


Slides/links

  • Jan 9, 2018: ARC subcommitee 2nd review:  slide


Project template for project proposal

Project Name:

Project name: Container based network service/function deployment(ONAP container support):

code name: COE

Repository name: multicloud/container


Project Description:

The effort will investigate/drive a way to allow ONAP to deploy/manage Network Services/VNFs over container/COE.

Increasing VNF density on each node and latency requirements are driving container based VNFs.  This project enhances ONAP to support VNFs as containers in addition to VNFs as VMs.

  • Support for multiple container orchestration technologies as cloud infrastructure - allow VNFs to run within container technology and also allow closed feedback loop same to VM based VIM. e.g. openstack
  • Support for co-existence of VNF VMs and VNF containers - Add container orchestration technology in addition to the traditional VM-based VIM or environment managed by ONAP. So that VNFs can be deployed within container by ONAP.
  • Support for uniform network connectivity among VMs and containers.

Goal and scope

the first target of container/COE is k8s. but other container/COE technology, e.g. docker swarm, is not precluded. If volunteers steps up for it, it would be also addressed.

  • Have ONAP take advantage of container/COE technology for cloud native era
  • Utilizing of industry momentum/direction for container/COE
  • Influence/feedback the related technologies(e.g. TOSCA, container/COE)

  • Teach ONAP container/COE instead of openstack so that VNFs can be deployed/run over container/COE in cloud native way

At the same time it's important to keep ONAP working, not break them.

  • Don’t change the existing components/work flow with (mostly) zero impact.
  • Leverage the existing interfaces and the integration points where possible

Functionality

  • Allow VNFs within container through container orchestration managed by ONAP same to VM based VIM.
  • Allow closed loop feedback and policy
  • Allow container based VNFs to be designed
  • Allow container based VNFs be configured and monitored.
  • Kubernetes cloud infrastructure as initial container orchestration technology under Multi-Cloud project.


API/Interfaces

the following table summarizes the impact on other projects

component

comment

modelling

New names of Data model to describe k8s node/COE instead of compute/openstack.

Already modeling for k8s is being discussed.

OOF

New policy to use COE, to run VNF in container

A&AI/ESR

Schema extensions to represent k8s data. (kay value pairs)

Multicloud

New plugin for COE/k8s.

(depending on the community discussion, ARIA and helm support needs to be considered. But this is contained within multicloud project.)


First target for first release

the scope of Beijing is


Scope for Beijing


    1. First baby step to support containers in a Kubernetes cluster via a Multicloud SBI / Plugin

    2. Minimal implementation with zero impact on MVP of Multicloud Beijing work

Use Cases

    1. Sample VNFs(vFW and vDNS)

integration scenario

    1. Register/unregister k8s cluster instance which is already deployed. (dynamic deployment of k8s is out of scope)

    2. onboard VNFD/NSD to use container

    3. Instantiate / de-instantiate containerized VNFs through K8S Plugin in K8S cluster

    4. Vnf configuration with sample VNFs(vFW, vDNS)

Target for later release

  • Installer/test/integration
  • More container orchestration technology
  • More than sample VNFs
  • delegating functionalities to CoE/K8S

Non-Goal/out of scope

The followings are not goal or out-of-scope of this proposal.

Architecture Alignment.

  • How does this project fit into the rest of the ONAP Architecture?

    • The architecture (will be)is designed to enhancement to some existing project.

    • It doesn’t introduce new dependency

  • How does this align with external standards/specifications?

    • Convert TOSCA model to each container northbound APIs in some ONAP component. To be discussed.

  • Are there dependencies with other open source projects?

    • Kubernetes pod API or other container northbound AP

    • CNCF(Cloud Native Computing Foundation), OCI(Open Container Initiative), CNI(Container Networking interface)


UseCases

  • sample VNF(vFW and vDNS): In Beijing only deploying those VNF over CoE
  • other potential usecases(vCPE) are addressed after Beijing release.


the work flow to register k8s instance is depicted as follows


the work flow to deploy VNF into pod is as follows


Other Information:

  • link to seed code (if applicable) N/A

  • Vendor Neutral

    • if the proposal is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, have you ensured that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc., have been removed?

  • Meets Board policy (including IPR)

Use the above information to create a key project facts section on your project page


Key Project Facts:

This project will be subproject of Multicloud project. Isaku will lead this effort under the umbrella of multicloud project.

NOTE: if this effort is sub-project of multicloud as ARC committee recommended, this will be same to multicloud's.

Facts

Info

PTL (first and last name)same to multicloud project
Jira Project Namesame to multicloud project
Jira Keysame to multicloud project
Project IDsame to multicloud project
Link to Wiki SpaceContainer based network service/function deployment (DEPRECATED)

Release Components Name:

Note: refer to existing project for details on how to fill out this table

Components Name

Components Repository name

Maven Group ID

Components Description

containermulticloud/containerorg.onap.multicloud.containercontainer orchestration engine cloud infrastructure




Resources committed to the Release:

Note 1: No more than 5 committers per project. Balance the committers list and avoid members representing only one company.

Note 2: It is critical to complete all the information requested, that will help to fast forward the onboarding process.

Role

First Name Last Name

Linux Foundation ID

Email Address

Location

committerIsaku Yamahatayamahataisaku.yamahata@gmail.comPT(pacific time zone)
contributorsMunish Agarwal
Munish.Agarwal@ericsson.com

Bin Hubh526rbh526r@att.com

Manjeet S. Bhatiamanjeets


Phuoc Hoanghoangphuocbkphuoc.hc@dcn.ssu.ac.kr

Mohamed ElSerngawymelserngawymohamed.elserngawy@kontron.comEST
Interested (will attend my first on 20180206) - part of oom and logging projectsmichaelobrienfrank.obrien@amdocs.comEST (GMT-5)



  • No labels

12 Comments

  1. Thank you for this proposal.  This is an important area that ONAP needs to begin planning for, as we will see more containerized network functions in the future.

    My biggest question is what is the best way to address these needs in ONAP, because (as the slides show) most of the changes impact existing projects.  I don't know that Project is the right approach.  I think perhaps it might be a mix of use cases and architecture subcommittee work.

    Could we work during the Beijing release timeline to fully understand the impacts of containerized network functions on different projects & get buy-in from those projects to implement those changes in the 3rd release?

  2. There are several interesting activities happening in the ecosystem around containerized network functions and beyond, e.g. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2017-nfvrg-01/session/nfvrg. Perhaps worth having a sub-committee for driving this forward which is looking at the ecosystem and also the ONAP project impact which Jason mentioned. Thoughts?



  3. Hi team,

    Can I become a contributor for this project? I would like  find some gaps between TOSCA and Kubernetes templates, K8s register and contribute code if possible.

    Thanks!

  4. What is a relation of this project to Multi VIM/Cloud Project? Do issues and challenges addressed here will be (or already are) addressed in Multi VIM/Cloud Project?

  5. Phuoc, please attend the weekly meeting (and multicloud weekliy meeting) and show your interest.

    Let's discuss there in details.


    1. In this week, I will upload some of my investigation about gaps between TOSCA and Kubernetes. Hope you guys can fix me about that.

  6. @Lukasz, based on the feedback from ARC subcommittee, this effort would be a subproject under the unbrella of multicloud project.

    Actually we have talked with them closely and will.

    container support brings _new_ issues/challenges in addition to the existing ones that multicloud has been addressing.


  7. Is there any work ongoing on containerized VNFs within MutliVIM/Cloud?
    I tried to go thru the WIKI pages of MultiVIM, but haven`t found a lot...

  8. What is the status of this?   Does ONAP have any support for CNFs currently or planned?   It looks like some work may have happened in multi-cloud, but I haven't found a use case or end-to-end support described anywhere.

    1. Please see this link: K8S based Cloud Region Support  on what would be available in R4.

      For R5 (or R6 if R5 is going to be technical debt release), please check this : K8S based Cloud region support (Continue from R4)

      Use cases that would be tested are:

      • vFirewall where 'packet generator', 'firewall' are VNFs and sink as a CNF. But all getting brought up by ONAP and K8S.
      • EdgeXFoundry use case
      • Distributed Analytics as a service

      Ritu Sood Kiran Kamineni Akhila Kishore

  9. CNCF is pursuing work to support CNFs on ONAP. I'd encourage you to participate in these monthly calls: https://github.com/cncf/cnf-testbed