You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 18 Next »

This table summarizes each project's plan in regard to support of "Platform Maturity" in Dublin Release. The data below are extracted from each project plan.

The Platform Maturity recommendations are documented in Platform Maturity Requirements (and sub-pages) from Jason Hunt

Legend

Color code:

  • Red: below maturity level
  • Yellow: same maturity.
  • Green: improved maturity level.

M1 Actual represents the assessment before M1. M1 Target represents, at M1 date, what the team plans to implement. M4 result represents what has been really implemented at M4 date . All these fields are self-assessed by the team.




AREA

Design / Run-TimePerformanceStabilityResiliencySecurityScalabilityManageabilityUsability
Min TSC Recommendations
M1 Actual

M1 Target

M4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 resultM1 ActualM1 TargetM4 result
Project Name





















A&AIR11
11
22
11
11

1+

(see note #10)

1
11
Application Authorization FrameworkR1

2

2

2

2

1

1

APPCR01
11
22
11
11
11
11
CLAMPD00
11
11
11
11
11
11
Common Controller SDKR00
NA

22
11
11
11
11
DCAED & R1



2

2

1

1

1

1

DMaaPR1

1

2

WIP

Note #9



1

1

1

DocumentationNA




















External API FrameworkR1

1

2

1

1

1

2

HolmesR12
12
12
12
11
11
12

Integration

NA




















Logging Enhancements Project R2

2

2

1

12
1 (see note #8)

1

POMBA (under but separate pod from Logging)R      2

     2

     2

       1

     1

     1

      1

Microservices BusR1

1

2

1

1

1

1

ModelingD/R1

2

1

1

1

1

1

Multi VIM/CloudR11
11
22
11
11
11
11
MUSICR1

1

2

2

1

1

1

ONAP CLID & R1

1

2

1

1

1

2

ONAP Operations ManagerNA




















ONAP Optimization FrameworkR1

1

2

1

1

1

1

ONAP Usecase UI Project ProposalD1

1

2

1

1

11+11

Policy Framework Project ProposalD & R

1+

See Note #5



1

See Note #4



1

See Note #4



1

1

See Note #4



1

See Note #6



1

Portal Platform Project ProposalD & R11
11
22
11
11
11
22
SDN-CR00
11
22
11
11
11
11
Service Design & CreationD0

1

1

1

00
1

1

Service OrchestratorR1

1

2

1

1

1

1

VFCR11
11
22
11
11
11
12
VIDR0

2

(Note #1)



2

1

1

1 (Note #8)

1

VNF SDKD00
11
11
11
01
11
12
VNF RequirementsNA




















VNF Validation (VVP)DNA

NA

NA

1

NA

NA

NA


Note 1: Assumption is that platform 72 hour test is run by Integration team; Component team will run regression (Level 1) on Casablanca release

Note 4: The policy project added a new application component to support SDC Service Distribution for the HPA Use Case. However, promised resources did not fulfill any of the S3P work for this runtime component.

Note 5: Only the drools PDP had a performance plan improvement. We ran out of time to build a performance plan for XACML PDP. (NOTE: No requirements for brand new Apex PDP, that is targeted for 'E' release).

Note 6: The resources for doing logging v1.2 went away as part of the contract/restructuring between the two corporations early 2018.

Note 8: logging spec and implementation changes done with AT&T/TechMahindra to sync to Acumos - logging resources are absolute minimal during casablanca - 1.2 spec completion is pushed to Dublin

Note 9: AAF CADI integration is pending

Note 10: logging spec very close to 1.2; completion slated for Dublin

Note 11: As per risk# 3 and 4, all the target maturity levels for Portal will remain same as actuals due to resource constraint. 



  • No labels