Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameJakarta
Project Lifecycle StateMature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company AT&T, Nokia, Ericsson, Wipro, Samsung, Huawei, DT

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Release Focus

DCAE Focus for R10 is on following

  • Complete DCAE transformation to Helm
    • Common Template Enhancement for dcaegen2-services-common (filebeat removal + general add-on capabilities)
    • Continue removal of Consul dependency & application config standardization via configmap
    • MOD Support for Helm chart generation/distribution
    • Deprecate Cloudify and related Handlers from ONAP deployment
    • Integration Testsuite migration to use helm chart
  • Support TSC approved ONAP Usecases and Features (details below)
  • TSC/SECCOM Global requirements 
    • STDIO complaince for Heartbeat and SNMPTRap MS
  • TSC/SECCOM Best Practice
    • Integration base image alignment for VES/RESTConf/SliceAnalysis MS
  • Reducing DCAE backlogs  & security fixes
  • Microservice enhancements in support for ONAP usecases/features 


Jakarta Usecases with DCAE impact

REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssessmentDCAE JIRA #

REQ-1085 - E2E Network Slicing use case enhancements for Jakarta release

YES

1. Slice selection taking into consideration resource occupancy levels (NSI/NSSI Selection based on resource occupancy levels - DCAE changes)
2. IBN based Closed loop for Network Slicing

Commitment from WIPRO  

DCAEGEN2-3021

REQ-1042 - 5G SON use case enhancements for Jakarta release

NO

No new impact for DCAE in J release

  1. Development of PM/FM/CM VES message formats which are aligned with O-RAN O1
  2. Modifications of SON-Handler MS to work with updated PM/FM message formats

DCAEGEN2-2986

Jakarta Features with DCAE Impact

REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssessmentDCAE JIRA #

REQ-1076 - CCVPN Jakarta Enhancements for Intent-based Cloud Leased Line and Closed-loop

YES

Slice Analysis enhancement

  1. Support bandwidth evaluation and CL event generation
  2. AAI Interface for bandwidth update notification

Commitment from HUAWEI for Development; Wipro team support reviews

DCAEGEN2-3063

REQ-1074 - Smart Intent Guarantee based on Closed-loop in R10

YES

Same as REQ-1076 

+

Introduction of ML/MS mS (POC)

Commitment from Wipro

DCAEGEN2-3063

DCAEGEN2-3067 (POC)

REQ-1038 - DCAE Transformation to support Helm (Phase3/final)

YES

Cloudify/platform-handlers deprecation; MOD helm integration

Commitment from AT&T, Nokia, Ericsson, Wipro, Huawei

DCAEGEN2-2773

Jakarta Spec with DCAE Impact

REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssessmentDCAE JIRA #

Epic - Created by Jira Software - do not edit or delete. Issue type for a big user story that needs to be broken down. REQ-935 Bulk PM / PM Data Control Improvements

YES

PMSH functional enhancement and support for dynamic filter/subscription change via API

Commitment from Ericsson

DCAEGEN2-2908

DCAEGEN2-2906

NANo

CMPv2 Enhancement - support for VES/DFC/HV-VES cert dynamically

DCAEGEN2-2886

NADeferredVES 7.2.1 support for DCAE Microservices (outside of collectors)

DCAEGEN2-2975

NADeferredDMAAP SDK standardization for DCAE Microservices

DCAEGEN2-3030

NAStretch-goal

Migrate DCAE MS to use standard topics (i.e unauthenticated) - PM-Mapper, Slice-Analysis, KPI-MS

This will aid in Dmaap/Strimzi migration/Servicemesh complaincy and addressing Multiple subscriber issue (DCAEGEN2-2937)

Commitment from Nokia, Wipro

DCAEGEN2-3031

NAStretch-goal

AAF certificate dependency to be removed by making it a configurable property for MS

Commitment from Nokia

DCAEGEN2-3037

Jakarta POC (DCAE impact)

REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssessmentDCAE JIRA #
NAYES

Trial use of the black formatting and pylint checking tools on python code

Commitment from AT&T 

DCAEGEN2-2994





Best Practices/GLOBAL Requirements

REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssesmentDCAE JIRA #

REQ-443 - CONTINUATION OF CII BADGING SCORE IMPROVEMENTS FOR SILVER LEVEL

Global-REQ 

YES

CII badging score improvement

Commitment from AT&T 

DCAEGEN2-2829

REQ-439 - CONTINUATION OF PACKAGES UPGRADES IN DIRECT DEPENDENCIES

Global-REQ

YES

Tcagen2, DFC, RESTConf, MOD-runtimeAPI, Mapper, PM-Mapper, PRH, SON-Handler, KPI-Computation MS, Slice-Analysis MS

Commitment from AT&T, Nokia, Wipro

DCAEGEN2-3006

REQ-437 - COMPLETION OF PYTHON LANGUAGE UPDATE (v2.7 → v3.8)

Global-REQ

YES


(No new impact for DCAE in J release)

DCAEGEN2-3020

REQ-438 - COMPLETION OF JAVA LANGUAGE UPDATE (v8 → v11)

Global-REQ

No
  • dcaemod-designtool
  • dcaemod-nifi-registry

Exception will be filed with SECCOM for waivers due to upstream (NIFi) dependency

DCAEGEN2-3019
REQ-432 - IPv4/IPv6 dual stack support in ONAPYES

Enhance ONAP common-service template - add IPv4/IPv6 support

(No new impact for DCAE in J release)

OOM-2749 

REQ-441/REQ-1070 - LOGS MANAGEMENT - PHASE 1: COMMON PLACE FOR DATA - JAKARTA RELEASE

Global-REQ

YES

Healthcheck and SNMPTRap container


Commitment from AT&T 

DCAEGEN2-2958

REQ-1073 - Using basic image from Integration  

YES

VESCollector, RESTConf, Slice-Analysis MS need to be switched to use integration base image


Commitment from Nokia, Huawei, Wipro, AT&T

REQ-1072 - Standardized logging fieldsStretch-goal

No change planned for existing Ms, however will be handled for new ML/MS POC delivery; 

Commitment from Wipro

Tracked under DCAEGEN2-3067

Note: The above commitment should be consistent with Jakarta Impact View per Component at M2.

New Services introduced for this release 

Following new services will be delivered as POC in R10


Platform Maturity

 Platform Maturity (i.e., S3P items)  Jakarta Release Platform Maturity


 Green color → Target level ( details see Platform Maturity below)

      • Performance:  Level 1
      • Stability: Level 2
      • Resiliency: Level 2
      • Security: Level 1+
      • Scalability: Level 1
      • Manageability: Level 1+
      • Usability: Level 1+             

Minimum Viable Product

As DCAE transformation is underway, two different deployment options will be available. The MVP of DCAE will vary based on deployment choice and will include the necessary subcomponents supporting the primary objectives: meeting platform maturity goals and supporting the use cases.


Helm Deployment (dcaegen2-services)

    •   VESCollector
    •   TCA-gen2
    •   PRH
    •   HV_VES


      Following platform component will be continued to be deployed via helm until all DCAE MS are migrated to new Config management solution via SDK

    • ConfigBinding Service*
    • Consul


      DCAE-MOD deployment is optional and will include following component (controlled via helm chart configuration under OOM)

    • Genprocessor
    • MOD/NiFI UI
    • Distributorapi
    • Runtimeapi
    • Onboardingapi

     * - Will be assessed at M3 depending on Helm migration feature status.


Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Stories

Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Longer term roadmap


Complete DCAE transformation initatives and backlog items.

    • DCAE/OOM: Remove consul dependency after all DCAE service are migrated to the latest SDK
    • Policy/CLAMP: Continue integration for Control Loop design for Helm-based deployment of DCAE Services*
    • DCAE: Chart migration from OOM repo to DCAE & ONAP CI/CD integration for helm chart builds
    • DCAE MOD support for Java11 compatibility 

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
Component spec

All ms added into DCAE should provide meta data representation of the component itself; will be used to generate

design flow under MOD and enable blueprint generation 

configbinding

SourceCode/Docker image

policy side-carSourceCode/Docker image
dcae-healthcheckSourceCode/Docker image
dcae-modSourceCode/jar/Docker image/Documentation

VES Collector

SourceCode/Docker image/helm charts

HV_VES CollectorSourceCode/jar/Docker image/helm charts
PRHSourceCode/jar/Docker image/helm charts
TCA-GEN2SourceCode/jar/Docker image/helm charts
DFCSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
RESTConfSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
PM-MAPPERSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
VES-MAPPERSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts

DL Components (DES,

DL-ADMIN, DL-FEEDER)

SourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
SLICE ANALYSISSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts

KPI-MS

SourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
HEARTBEAT MSSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
SON-HANDLER MSSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts
PMSHSourceCode/Docker image/helm charts

Note: Only default platform components and bootstrapped MS is listed on table above. DCAE also include dynamic service components deployed based on usecases. For a complete set of available DCAE MS - refer https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-dcaegen2/en/latest/sections/release-notes.html#deliverables


Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release. Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Resources and Repositories (Deprecated) in the centralized page.


ONAP Dependencies

List the other ONAP projects you depend on.


DCAE depends on the the following components as part of the general ONAP architecture:

    • AAI: DCAE MS retrieves and updates VNF data from/to AAI
    • DMaaP: Message bus for communication with other components in the solution
    • Policy/CLAMP - Policy - For managing application configuration policy. 
    • OOF - For SON handler support

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the Amsterdam architecture diagram_1.0.0.pptx.




 DCAE Interfaces

Platform Maturity


Jakarta Release Platform Maturity


Refering to 2017-06-28 CII badging for ONAP.pptx and Platform Maturity Requirements (aka Carrier Grade), fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance11
    • Level 0: no performance testing done
    • Level 1: baseline performance criteria identified and measured  (such as response time, transaction/message rate, latency, footprint, etc. to be defined on per component)
    • Level 2: performance improvement plan created 
    • Level 3: performance improvement plan implemented for 1 release (improvement measured for equivalent functionality & equivalent hardware)
Stability2

2




    • Level 0: none beyond release requirements
    • Level 1: 72 hour component-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
    • Level 2: 72 hour platform-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
    • Level 3: track record over 6 months of reduced defect rate
Resiliency22
    • 0 – none
    • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
    • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
    • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security1

1+  



    • Level 0: None
    • Level 1: CII Passing badge
      • Including no critical and high known vulnerabilities > 60 days old
    • Level 2: CII Silver badge, plus:
      • All internal/external system communications shall be able to be encrypted.
      • All internal/external service calls shall have common role-based access control and authorization using CADI framework.
    • Level 3: CII Gold badge 
Scalability1

1



    • Level 0: no ability to scale
    • Level 1: supports single site horizontal scale out and scale in, independent of other components
    • Level 2: supports geographic scaling, independent of other components
    • Level 3: support scaling (interoperability) across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability1

1+  (Except logging, all other requirements are met)



    • Level 1:
    • All ONAP components will use a single logging system.
    • Instantiation of a simple ONAP system should be accomplished in <1 hour with a minimal footprint
    • Level 2:
      • A component can be independently upgraded without impacting operation interacting components
      • Component configuration to be externalized in a common fashion across ONAP projects
      • All application logging to adhere to ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2
      • Implement guidelines for a minimal container footprint
    • Level 3
      • Transaction tracing across components
Usability1

1+



    • Level 1:
      • User guide created
      • Deployment documentation
      • API documentation
      • Adherence to coding guidelines
    • Level 2:
    • Level 3
      • Consistent UI across ONAP projects
      • Usability testing conducted
      • API Documentation
    • Level 4


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects. Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
Policy EngineAPI for retrieving configuration policy updates via Policy SidecarCurrently AvailableCurrently AvailableNA
Policy (PDP) API to push DCAE MS configuration/policy modelsCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
A&AIAPI invoked for information enhancementsCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
DMaaP Message RouterAPI for topic publish /subscribeCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
DMaaP Bus ControllerDMaaP Bus Controller is a part of DMaaP that provides topic provisioning; this is the API for topic provisioning.Currently AvailableCurrently Available
 OOF

 PCI Optimization API http://{OOF-host}:{port}/api/oof/v1/pci

 http://{pcims-host}:{port}/callbackUrl Call back URL for SON-MS (to provide PCI optimization results)

 Currently Available Currently Available
 ConfigDB

http://{ConfigDB-host/IP}:{port}/SDNCConfigDBAPI/getNbrList/{cellId}/{ts} (Get neighbor list for  a cell Id)

http://{ConfigDB-host/IP}:{port}/SDNCConfigDBAPI/getPnfName/{cellId}/{ts} (Get the PNF name for a cell Id)
 Currently AvailableCurrently AvailableThis will be replaced with CPS for Jakarta
CPSUsed by SON-handler and Slice-Analysis MSCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
VES CollectorAPI for VNFs to send VES data Currently Available
No change for this release
HealthcheckAPI for querying DCAE component healthcheck Currently AvailableR4No change for this release
DCAE Onboarding APIAPI for publishing DCAE spec into MODCurrently AvailableR6No change for this release
Data Extraction Service (DES)API for data retrieval and simple computation from DL-Handler maintained storages (For R8, this will be used by DCAE components such Slice-Analyis MS) and UUICurrently AvailableR8No change for this release
PMSH API support for Subscription/Filters/Measurement group management Under review R10 M2

https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/tree/docs/sections/apis/pmsh_swagger.json

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/dcaegen2/+/126725

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/dcaegen2/+/121898

SliceAnalysis MsAPI support for data aggregation based on NSI/NSSI; this will be consumed by OOFReviewedR10 M2

https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/tree/docs/sections/apis/swagger_slice_analysis.json

https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/117740396/slice-analysis-swagger.yaml?version=1&modificationDate=1640159785000&api=v2






  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected. List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
NIFIApache NIFI1.9.x
Consul
version based on OOM 



In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release. List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact


  • Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
Loading...
Refresh

  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
Due to upstream dependency on NIFI project, some of MOD (NiFI) components (designtool/gen-processor/nifi-registry) will remain in java 8

Request exception for SECCOM.

Assess migration to use new MOD2 standalone components for onboarding (based on community resource/support)

DCAEGEN2-3019

  • Resources

Please see the INFO.yaml files associated with each repo as the authoritative sources of information. https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:dcae

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Planning: Jakarta  and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.


  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

Date to be completed bySprint#No of days Deliverable 
Key dates for Jakarta release - Release Planning: Jakarta
M2DCAE Jakarta Sprint 1 (Planning)
  • Finalize DCAE scope and committment
  • API definition formalized and shared with impacted teams
M2-M3DCAE Jakarta Sprint 2 (Development)
  • 50% or more of Functional delivery completed
  • Atleast 60% of release/compliance (coverage & security)
  • Integration test plan completed
  • CSIT/automated test delivery
  • SDK version to be baselined and released
  • Documentation repo updates (API updates & new MS/component) - Jakarta Documentation
M3 DCAE Jakarta Sprint 3 (Code Freeze)
  • All code intended for release MUST be submitted into gerrit
  • 100% of release/compliance (coverage & security)
  • Validate deployment/integration with ONAP/DCAE deploy
  • Update OOM chart/blueprint/documentation to reflect correct version
  • Documentation update for deployment/configuration/architecture/logging
M4DCAE Jakarta Sprint 4  (Container Release/artifact)

Finalize containers/jars for Jakarta release and submit patch to OOM for revisions

RCIntegration/Sign-Off
  • Fix Integration blockers and high priorty issue
  • Demo for new components introduced
  • Pair-wise testing
  • Branching
  • Documentation, Training


      • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
      • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
      • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
      • Documentation includes items such as:
        • Installation instructions
        • Configuration instructions
        • Developer guide
        • End User guide
        • Admin guide

           Jakarta Documentation

Other Information

    • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

    • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible. List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ). In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP TSC Charter OBSOLETE 7 1 CLEAN.pdf.